By using the example of Radha-Krishna, it makes it legitimate for one community and pretty much leaves out atheists.īesides, the idea of Krishna is based on several myths and his relationship with women constitutes merely one of them. The cult of Krishna, although utterly charming in its joie de vivre – the ras leela is based on the concept of letting go of inhibitions, is not empowering for women. “If the gopikas could do their duty to their husbands, tend their families and above all be totally devoted to me all the time, you can do the same thing. I shall not leave you any time,” said he to Meera in one of her dreams. Meera, who was married to Rana Bhojraj, was platonically committed to Lord Krishna, even sleeping with the idol. She argued with her spouse, “Krishna is the only Purusha and all of us are women. There is only one King and my life belongs to him.” The process of a legal discussion on live-in relationships began when the South Indian actress, Khushboo, spoke about pre-marital sex. She was threatened and there were several cases filed against her. Malimath panel had recommended that women in live-in relationships must get wife status. While seemingly taking into account “practical realities”, it in fact was legitimising bigamy and adultery.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |